The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Classifying ‘CCs’: Community, Complementary and Local Currencies
Open accessAbstract
Since the emergence of “CCs” thirty years ago, attempts to build typologies and to name things properly have always been disappointing, as if the very object of the analysis escaped from any rigid classification. Even the terms “complementary currency”, “community currency” and many others are not considered similarly; as a result, there is no common typology shared by scholars, activists and observers, beyond a series of general considerations clearly distinguishing specific items between CC schemes. This paper presents a novel attempt to classify and categorise CCs in a way which looks to future developments, while capturing the diversity of historical origins. The ideal types of community, complementary and local currencies let the possibility of combinations able to analyze concrete forms of non-national and not-for-profit currencies. The teleological exclusion of sovereignty and, more important, profit motives must be emphasized. The present typology states that for-profit currencies are of another nature than CCs, and it draws up an ideal-type of CCs built around a democratic participation principle organized around non-profit organizations, grassroots organizations or informal groupings of persons.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proponents of these practices typically argue that they embody an important aspect of democracy, namely, bottom-up participation and citizen engagement (Blanc 2011; Servet 2013; Seyfang and Longhurst 2013).”
From The Ethics of Alternative Currencies (2022) · cites this paper as Blanc 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Money and the Commons: An Investigation of Complementary Currencies and Their Ethical Implications
Meyer, C., & Hudon, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3923-1 · Cited by 83
Taxonomy of digital community currency platforms
Diniz, E. H., Siqueira, E. S., & van Heck, E. (2019) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2018.1485005 · Cited by 47
The Ethics of Alternative Currencies
Larue, L., Meyer, C., Hudon, M., & Sandberg, J. (2022) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.52 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanc, J.
- Corresponding author
- Blanc, Jérôme
- ORCID
- Blanc, Jérôme
- Venue
- International Journal of Community Currency Research
- Publisher
- International Journal of Community Currency Research
- Published
- 2011-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W6961528031
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Universiteitsbibliotheek EUR
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Keywords
- community currencies, complementary currencies, local currency, ideal types, grassroots organizations, democratic participation, sovereignty, profit motive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying ‘CCs’: Community, Complementary and Local Currencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15133/j.ijccr.2011.013
- The paper
- Blanc, J. (2011). Classifying ‘CCs’: Community, Complementary and Local Currencies. International Journal of Community Currency Research. https://doi.org/10.15133/j.ijccr.2011.013