Do Cigarette Taxes Make Smokers Happier
Abstract
Some policy makers justify cigarette taxes by arguing that they actually make smokers better off. This argument has been hard to evaluate because behavioral data, such as that showing reduced cigarette consumption following a tax hike, cannot resolve the issue of whether smokers are made better off by the reduction or not. In this paper, we directly assess the effect of cigarette taxes on well-being, using subjective well-being data. We model the differential impact of excise taxes on those with a propensity to smoke, relative to others, in order to control for omitted correlations between happiness and excise taxation. Using US data on happiness and state-level changes in excise taxes, we find consistent evidence that excise taxes make those who have a propensity to smoke happier. To assess robustness, we repeat the exercise using Canadian data, which has independent information on well-being and also much larger tax changes, and find the exact same pattern. Moreover, these impacts are present for cigarette excise taxes, but not for other excise taxes. These results suggest that the welfare effects of cigarette taxation are far more complex than simple rational economic models might predict.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SWB can be used for assessing the consequences of cigarette taxation, air pollution, flooding, and the risk of terrorism.
“SWB can also be used for assessing the consequences of cigarette taxation (Gruber and Mullainatha, 2005), air pollution (Luechinger, 2009), flooding (Luechinger and Rasacky, 2009) and the risk of terrorism (Metcalfe et al., 2011).”
From Measuring Subjective Wellbeing: Recommendations on Measures for use by National Governments (2012) · cites this paper as Gruber and Mullainatha, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 56
- Authors
- Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S.
- Affiliations
- MIT,
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-07-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1935-1682 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-6108
- OpenAlex
- W4206595829
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- cigarette taxes, excise tax, subjective well-being, happiness, welfare effects, cigarette consumption, health policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review