Cited by 56Smoking Behavior and CessationEconomic and Fiscal StudiesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Do Cigarette Taxes Make Smokers Happier

Gruber, Jonathan H, Mullainathan, Sendhil·2005·The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Abstract

Some policy makers justify cigarette taxes by arguing that they actually make smokers better off. This argument has been hard to evaluate because behavioral data, such as that showing reduced cigarette consumption following a tax hike, cannot resolve the issue of whether smokers are made better off by the reduction or not. In this paper, we directly assess the effect of cigarette taxes on well-being, using subjective well-being data. We model the differential impact of excise taxes on those with a propensity to smoke, relative to others, in order to control for omitted correlations between happiness and excise taxation. Using US data on happiness and state-level changes in excise taxes, we find consistent evidence that excise taxes make those who have a propensity to smoke happier. To assess robustness, we repeat the exercise using Canadian data, which has independent information on well-being and also much larger tax changes, and find the exact same pattern. Moreover, these impacts are present for cigarette excise taxes, but not for other excise taxes. These results suggest that the welfare effects of cigarette taxation are far more complex than simple rational economic models might predict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/1538-0637.1412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SWB can be used for assessing the consequences of cigarette taxation, air pollution, flooding, and the risk of terrorism.

    “SWB can also be used for assessing the consequences of cigarette taxation (Gruber and Mullainatha, 2005), air pollution (Luechinger, 2009), flooding (Luechinger and Rasacky, 2009) and the risk of terrorism (Metcalfe et al., 2011).”

    From Measuring Subjective Wellbeing: Recommendations on Measures for use by National Governments (2012) · cites this paper as Gruber and Mullainatha, 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 56

Authors
Gruber, J. H., & Mullainathan, S.
Affiliations
  • MIT,
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2005-07-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1935-1682 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-6108
OpenAlex
W4206595829
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
cigarette taxes, excise tax, subjective well-being, happiness, welfare effects, cigarette consumption, health policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review