The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fir and Empire: The Transformation of Forests in Early Modern China
Open accessAbstract
A CHOICE OUTSTANDING ACADEMIC TITLE Restores China’s place in forest history The disappearance of China’s naturally occurring forests is one of the most significant environmental shifts in the country’s history, one often blamed on imperial demand for lumber. China’s early modern forest history is typically viewed as a centuries-long process of environmental decline, culminating in a nineteenth-century social and ecological crisis. Pushing back against this narrative of deforestation, Ian Miller charts the rise of timber plantations between about 1000 and 1700, when natural forests were replaced with anthropogenic ones. Miller demonstrates that this form of forest management generally rested on private ownership under relatively distant state oversight and taxation. He further draws on in-depth case studies of shipbuilding and imperial logging to argue that this novel landscape was not created through simple extractive pressures, but by attempts to incorporate institutional and ecological complexity into a unified imperial state. Miller uses the emergence of anthropogenic forests in south China to rethink both temporal and spatial frameworks for Chinese history and the nature of Chinese empire. Because dominant European forestry models do not neatly overlap with the non-Western world, China’s history is often left out of global conversations about them; Miller’s work rectifies this omission and suggests that in some ways, China’s forest system may have worked better than the…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have largely taken a state-centered approach that assumed the court was responsible for all large hydrological engineering projects.”
From Review of “Ruth Mostern 2021. The Yellow River: A Natural and Unnatural History” (2022) · cites this paper as Miller 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of “Ruth Mostern 2021. The Yellow River: A Natural and Unnatural History”
Molnar, A. (2022) · Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae · doi:10.1556/062.2022.00222
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, I. M.
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Ian M.
- ORCID
- Miller, Ian M.
- Venue
- University of Washington Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Washington Press
- Published
- 2020-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4405001517
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- University of Washington Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- University of Washington Libraries
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Environmental Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- deforestation, timber plantations, shipbuilding, private forest ownership, forest management, Chinese Empire, South China, early modern China, environmental history, forestry institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fir and Empire: The Transformation of Forests in Early Modern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780295747347
- The paper
- Miller, I. M. (2020). Fir and Empire: The Transformation of Forests in Early Modern China. University of Washington Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780295747347