Chapter 1. Getting “Right” with Heaven and the Origins of Writing in China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several elements of the Chinese script concerned with formative calendrical astronomy, perhaps first non-glottographic icons, now appear to antedate the late second millennium BCE OBI by multiple centuries.
“Still further, it is significant that a number of elements of the Chinese script concerned with formative calendrical astronomy, perhaps first taking the form of non-glottographic icons, now appear to antedate by multiple centuries the late second millennium bce OBI .31”
From Dōng 東 ‘East’ and the Chinese “Indian Circle” (2021) · cites this paper as Pankenier 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dōng 東 ‘East’ and the Chinese “Indian Circle”
Smith, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.4.0953 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pankenier, D. W.
- Corresponding author
- Pankenier, David W.
- ORCID
- Pankenier, David W.
- Venue
- Writing and Literacy in Early China
- Publisher
- University of Washington Press
- Published
- 2011-12-31
- Pages
- 19-58
- OpenAlex
- W4407961449
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Washington Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Keywords
- heaven, origins of writing, Chinese writing, Chinese cosmology, divination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
