The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INTRODUCTION Tantra in Practice: Mapping a Tradition
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many popular representations of esoteric Buddhist imagery as obscene or sexual can be dismissed as modern interpretations and constructs.
“Similar to tantric Buddhism elsewhere in Asia, many of the popular representations of such imagery can be dismissed as modern interpretations and constructs (White 2000, 4-5; Wedemeyer 2013, 18-36).”
From Editor's Introduction: Esoteric Traditions in Medieval Japan (2020) · cites this paper as White 2000
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Editor's Introduction: Esoteric Traditions in Medieval Japan
McMullen, M. D. (2020) · Japanese Journal of Religious Studies · doi:10.18874/jjrs.47.1.2020.1-10
Metadata
- Authors
- White, D. G.
- Corresponding author
- White, David Gordon
- Venue
- Tantra in Practice
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2000-12-31
- Pages
- 3-38
- OpenAlex
- W2944398228
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Keywords
- Tantra, Tantric practice, ritual, esoteric Buddhism, Hinduism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
