Cited by 1,251Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsStatistical Mechanics and EntropyStochastic processes and statistical mechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion

Nelson, Edward·1967·Princeton University Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691219615

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, E.
Corresponding author
Nelson, Edward
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
1967-12-31
OpenAlex
W4300023393
Cited by
1,251
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.43
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Keywords
Brownian motion, dynamical theory, molecular motion, diffusion, kinetic theory of gases, statistical mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review