The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making the Body Beautiful: A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract
Nose reconstructions have been common in India for centuries. South Korea, Brazil, and Israel have become international centers for procedures ranging from eyelid restructuring to buttock lifts and tummy tucks. Argentina has the highest rate of silicone implants in the world. Around the globe, aesthetic surgery has become a cultural and medical fixture. Sander Gilman seeks to explain why by presenting the first systematic world history and cultural theory of aesthetic surgery. Touching on subjects as diverse as getting a "nose job" as a sweet-sixteen birthday present and the removal of male breasts in seventh-century Alexandria, Gilman argues that aesthetic surgery has such universal appeal because it helps people to "pass," to be seen as a member of a group with which they want to or need to identify. Gilman begins by addressing basic questions about the history of aesthetic surgery. What surgical procedures have been performed? Which are considered aesthetic and why? Who are the patients? What is the place of aesthetic surgery in modern culture? He then turns his attention to that focus of countless human anxieties: the nose. Gilman discusses how people have reshaped their noses to repair the ravages of war and disease (principally syphilis), to match prevailing ideas of beauty, and to avoid association with negative images of the "Jew," the "Irish," the "Oriental," or the "Black." He examines how we have used aesthetic surgery on almost every conceivable part of the body t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In gendered systems of representation, women are defined by beauty. Women who lack beauty are flawed as women.”
From Race, beauty, and the tangled knot of a guilty pleasure (2006) · cites this paper as Gilman, 1999
In the citing paper
“Black women were frequently depicted in caricatures that emphasized large breasts (Gilman, 1999: 221) and buttocks (Hobson, 2003) in ways that signified sexuality of grotesque proportions.”
From Race, beauty, and the tangled knot of a guilty pleasure (2006) · cites this paper as Gilman, 1999: 221
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Race, beauty, and the tangled knot of a guilty pleasure
Craig, M. L. (2006) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700106064414 · Cited by 200
Fox, M., & Thomson, M. (2009) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164640902852415 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilman, S. L.
- Corresponding author
- Gilman, Sander L.
- ORCID
- Gilman, Sander L.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1999-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4206027272
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › History of Medical Practice
- Keywords
- cosmetic surgery, history of cosmetic surgery, body modification, rhinoplasty, beauty standards, social identity, passing, racial stereotypes, gender-affirming surgery, male breast reduction, body transformation, cultural history of medicine, history of surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review