The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Materials Development for TESOL
Abstract
The fundamental principles of materials development in TESOL Materials are at the very centre of language teaching, and understanding what goes into creating them is an essential part of a language teacher’s professional development. Offering a practical introduction to the fundamental principles of materials development in TESOL, this textbook introduces you to a wide range of theoretical and practical issues in materials development to enable you to make informed and principled choices in the selection, evaluation, adaptation and production of materials. Advocating a principled approach to the creation of materials, it combines an awareness of relevant language learning and teaching theory with a critical attitude to existing published materials. It also encourages critical reflection by demonstrating how choices need to be informed by an awareness of culture, context and purpose. Material Development in TESOL ’s stimulating approach, with thought-provoking, interactive tasks, online resources, and added perspectives from international research, makes it an ideal textbook for language teacher programmes around the world, equipping TESOL student teachers and practicing teachers with the frameworks, resources and practical skills necessary to carry out effective evaluations and to develop principled materials in practice. Written specifically for TESOL practitioners and those studying TESOL teaching Accessible presentation of concepts and research Accompanying website provides additional online resources and materials Interactive tasks and further reading suggestions Encourages students to critically reflect on their choices of materials
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The teacher acts as ' floating ' collaborator around discussion groups; this makes for a sort of ' communicational promiscuity ' (Mishan & Timmis, 2015, p. 42) which can be unfamiliar and awkward for students from cultures used to a transmission mode of teaching and/or clearly delineated teacher -learner roles.”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Mishan & Timmis, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper?
Mishan, F. (2022) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000646 · Cited by 60
“The teacher acts as ‘floating’ collaborator around discussion groups; this makes for a sort of ‘communicational promiscuity’ (Mishan & Timmis, 2015, p. 42) which can be unfamiliar and awkward for students from cultures used to a transmission mode of teaching and/or clearly delineated…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishan, F., & Timmis, I.
- Venue
- Edinburgh University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Edinburgh University Press
- Published
- 2015-06-03
- OpenAlex
- W2405187097
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Edinburgh University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- materials development, TESOL, language teaching materials, material evaluation, materials adaptation, material selection, language teacher professional development, critical reflection, language learning theory, language teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review