The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing Partnerships to Resist Psychiatry within Academia
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dominant medical model is heavily ingrained in public, political and academic consciousness.
“This contradicts the dominant medical model that is heavily ingrained in public, political and academic consciousness (Beresford & Menzies, 2014).”
From Challenging Involuntary Treatment and Confinement in Canada Through the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2024) · cites this paper as Beresford & Menzies, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rozinskis, R., & Rourke, C. (2024) · Studies in Social Justice · doi:10.26522/ssj.v18i3.4246 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Beresford, P., & Menzies, R.
- ORCID
- Beresford, Peter
- Venue
- Psychiatry Disrupted
- Publisher
- McGill-Queen's University Press
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Pages
- 77-95
- OpenAlex
- W2977774578
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › University Challenges and Reforms
- Keywords
- academic psychiatry, partnership, medical education, critique of psychiatry, mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
