Cited by 357Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorLanguage and cultural evolution

On the Origins of Human Emotions: A Sociological Inquiry into the Evolution of Human Affect

Turner, Jonathan H.·2000·Stanford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Language and culture are often seen as unique characteristics of human beings. In this book the author argues that our ability to use a wide array of emotions evolved long before spoken language and, in fact, constituted a preadaptation for the speech and culture that developed among later hominids. Long before humans could speak with words, they communicated through body language their emotional dispositions; and it is the neurological wiring of the brain for these emotional languages that represented the key evolutionary breakthrough for our species. How did natural selection work on the basic ape anatomy and neuroanatomy to create the hominid line? The author suggests that what distinguished our ancestors from other apes was the development of an increased capacity for sociality and organization, crucial for survival on the African savanna. All apes display a propensity for weak ties, individualism, mobility, and autonomy that was, and is today, useful in arboreal and woodland habitats but served them poorly when our ancestors began to move onto the African plain during the late Miocene. The challenge for natural selection was to enhance traits in the species that would foster the social ties necessary for survival in the new environment. The author suggests that the result was a development of certain areas of the primate brain that encouraged strong emotional ties, allowing our ancestors to build higher levels of social solidarity. Our basic neurological wiring continues…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780804764360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, selection at the group-level primarily works as cultural-group selection, which might be based on evolved psychological dispositions at the individual level.

    “In humans, selection at the group-level primarily works as cultural-group selection, which might be, however, based on evolved psychological dispositions at the individual level: the 'cultural brain' allows high-fidelity cultural transmission, our emotionality enables us to experience 'collective effervescence' (Durkheim, 1915), to respond with shame and guilt when violating norms (Turner, 2000(Tu”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Turner, 2000

Authors
Turner, J. H.
Corresponding author
Turner, Jonathan H.
Venue
Stanford University Press eBooks
Published
2000-06-01
OpenAlex
W4206903617
Cited by
357
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.47
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
emotions, evolution of emotions, hominid evolution, preadaptation, body language, primate sociality, social solidarity, brain evolution, neuroanatomy, natural selection, African savanna, Miocene, emotional communication, individualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review