On the Origins of Human Emotions: A Sociological Inquiry into the Evolution of Human Affect
Abstract
Language and culture are often seen as unique characteristics of human beings. In this book the author argues that our ability to use a wide array of emotions evolved long before spoken language and, in fact, constituted a preadaptation for the speech and culture that developed among later hominids. Long before humans could speak with words, they communicated through body language their emotional dispositions; and it is the neurological wiring of the brain for these emotional languages that represented the key evolutionary breakthrough for our species. How did natural selection work on the basic ape anatomy and neuroanatomy to create the hominid line? The author suggests that what distinguished our ancestors from other apes was the development of an increased capacity for sociality and organization, crucial for survival on the African savanna. All apes display a propensity for weak ties, individualism, mobility, and autonomy that was, and is today, useful in arboreal and woodland habitats but served them poorly when our ancestors began to move onto the African plain during the late Miocene. The challenge for natural selection was to enhance traits in the species that would foster the social ties necessary for survival in the new environment. The author suggests that the result was a development of certain areas of the primate brain that encouraged strong emotional ties, allowing our ancestors to build higher levels of social solidarity. Our basic neurological wiring continues…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In humans, selection at the group-level primarily works as cultural-group selection, which might be based on evolved psychological dispositions at the individual level.
“In humans, selection at the group-level primarily works as cultural-group selection, which might be, however, based on evolved psychological dispositions at the individual level: the 'cultural brain' allows high-fidelity cultural transmission, our emotionality enables us to experience 'collective effervescence' (Durkheim, 1915), to respond with shame and guilt when violating norms (Turner, 2000(Tu”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Turner, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Tuomela, R. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality
Windzio, M. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09531-2
- Authors
- Turner, J. H.
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Jonathan H.
- ORCID
- Turner, Jonathan H.
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4206903617
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- emotions, evolution of emotions, hominid evolution, preadaptation, body language, primate sociality, social solidarity, brain evolution, neuroanatomy, natural selection, African savanna, Miocene, emotional communication, individualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review