The DOI matches its Crossref record.
6. Filial Obligations in Chinese Families: Paradoxes of Modernization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marriage and Family in East Asia: Continuity and Change
Raymo, J. M., Park, H., Xie, Y., & Yeung, W. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428 · Cited by 803
Bedford, O. A., & Yeh, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100 · Cited by 391
The erosion of filial piety by modernisation in Chinese cities
CHEUNG, C.-K., & KWAN, A. Y.-H. (2009) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x08007836 · Cited by 278
The Effects of Grandparents on Children’s Schooling: Evidence From Rural China
Zeng, Z., & Xie, Y. (2014) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0275-4 · Cited by 272
Do Sons or Daughters Give More Money to Parents in Urban China?
Xie, Y., & Zhu, H. (2009) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00588.x · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Whyte, M. K.
- Corresponding author
- Whyte, Martin King
- ORCID
- Whyte, Martin King
- Venue
- Filial Piety
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2004-02-12
- Pages
- 106-127
- OpenAlex
- W79691434
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- filial duty, Chinese family, modernization, family relationships, kinship, gender roles, Confucian values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
