Cited by 494Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceChinese history and philosophy

Governing China's Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics

Greenhalgh, Susan, Winckler, Edwin A.·2005·Stanford University Press eBooks

Abstract

China's giant project in social engineering has drawn worldwide attention, both because of its coercive enforcement of strict birth limits, and because of the striking changes that have occurred in China's population: one of the fastest fertility declines in modern history and a gender gap among infants that is the highest in the world. These changes have contributed to an imminent crisis of social security for a rapidly aging population, provoking concern in China and abroad. What political processes underlie these population shifts? What is the political significance of population policy for the PRC regime, the Chinese people, and China's place in the world? The book documents the gradual "governmentalization" of China's population after 1949, a remarkable buildup of capacity for governance by the regime, the professions, and individuals. Since the turn of the millennium the regime has initiated a drastic shift from "hard" Leninist methods of birth planning toward "soft" neoliberal approaches involving indirect regulation by the state and self-regulation by citizens themselves. Population policy, once a lagging sector in China's transition from communism, is now helping lead the country toward more modern and internationally accepted forms of governance. Governing China's Population tells the story of these shifts, from the perspectives of both regime and society, based on internal documents, long-term fieldwork, and interviews with a wide range of actors—policymakers and implementers, propagandists and critics, compliers and resisters. This study also illuminates the far-reaching consequences for China's society and politics of deep state intrusion in individual reproduction. Like Mao's Great Leap Forward, Deng's one-child policy has created vast social suffering and human trauma. Yet power over population has also been positive and productive, promoting China's global rise by creating new kinds of "quality" persons equipped to succeed in the world economy. Politically, the PRC's population project has strengthened the regime and created a whole new field of biopolitics centering on the production and cultivation of life itself. Drawing on approaches from political science and anthropology that are rarely combined, this book develops a new kind of interdisciplinary inquiry that expands the domain of the political in provocative ways. The book provides fresh answers to broad questions about China's Leninist transition, regime capacity, "science" and "democracy," and the changing shape of Chinese modernity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780804767217

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fines ranged from one year of per capita income in the locale where the family resided to several times that.

    “The fines ranged from one year of per capita income in the locale where the family resided to several times that (Scharping 2003, Greenhalgh & Winckler 2005).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Greenhalgh & Winckler 2005

  • China's population project is a striking case of governmentalization in the Foucaultian sense, which includes both direct government intervention and indirect intervention by nonstate social institutions, and cultivation of individuals' self-regulation.

    “China's population project thus is a striking case of governmentalization in the Foucaultian sense, which includes both direct government intervention and indirect intervention by nonstate social institutions, and cultivation of individuals' self-regulation (Greenhalgh & Winckler 2005).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Greenhalgh & Winckler 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 494

Authors
Greenhalgh, S., & Winckler, E. A.
Venue
Stanford University Press eBooks
Published
2005-09-14
OpenAlex
W4206961935
Cited by
494
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 43
FWCI
13.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
population policy, one-child policy, fertility decline, sex ratio at birth, population governance, biopolitics, state regulation of reproduction, population aging, social security, Chinese modernity, post-communist transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review