The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race Decoded: The Genomic Fight for Social Justice
Abstract
Race Decoded explores the world of elite genomic science, investigating how the world's leading scientists grapple with questions of identity and social change in their efforts to understand a new science of race.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practical taxonomies are established that are products of objective evaluation and subjective judgment, iteratively reinforced by experience, and these categories become durable parts of the scientist's frame of reference.
“Practical taxonomies are established that are products of objective evaluation and subjective judgment, iteratively reinforced by experience (Bourdieu, 2000) and these categories become durable parts of the scientist's frame of reference (Bliss, 2012).”
From Skin color and race (2021) · cites this paper as Bliss, 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jablonski, N. G. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24200 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Bliss, C.
- Corresponding author
- Bliss, Catherine
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4243209521
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- race, genomics, science identity, social change, scientific racism, race and genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
