The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determined to Succeed?: Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment
Abstract
In many countries, concern about socio-economic inequalities in educational attainment has focused on inequalities in test scores and grades. The presumption has been that the best way to reduce inequalities in educational outcomes is to reduce inequalities in performance. But is this presumption correct? Determined to Succeed? is the first book to offer a comprehensive cross-national examination of the roles of performance and choice in generating inequalities in educational attainment. It combines in-depth studies by country specialists with chapters discussing more general empirical, methodological, and theoretical aspects of educational inequality. The aim is to investigate to what extent inequalities in educational attainment can be attributed to differences in academic performance between socio-economic groups, and to what extent they can be attributed to differences in the choices made by students from these groups. The contributors focus predominantly on inequalities related to parental class and parental education.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, school success, educational goals, and applying for higher education are strongly associated with HR and parents' educational attainment (Boudon, 1974;Breen & Goldthorpe, 1997;Jackson, 2013).”
From Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students (2023) · cites this paper as Jackson, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mijs, J. J. B. (2016) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0 · Cited by 290
Socioeconomic inequality in access to high-status colleges: A cross-country comparison
Jerrim, J., Chmielewski, A. K., & Parker, P. (2015) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.003 · Cited by 128
“Jantti, & Smeeding, 2012; Jackson, 2013) the following groups are formed: ‘Low’ education = ISCED 0–2 [less than high school] ‘Medium’ education = ISCED 3–5b [high school to associate’s degree] ‘High’ education = ISCED 5a/6 [bachelor’s degree and higher] Father’s occupation is recoded into the…”
BackgroundToo stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students
Nori, H., & Vanttaja, M. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00921-w · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2020-06-30
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review