The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms
Abstract
Scholarly and popular consensus has painted a picture of Indian Buddhist monasticism in which monks and nuns severed all ties with their families when they left home for the religious life. In this view, monks and nuns remained celibate, and those who faltered in their “vows” of monastic celibacy were immediately and irrevocably expelled from the Buddhist Order. This romanticized image is based largely on the ascetic rhetoric of texts such as the Rhinoceros Horn Sutra. Through a study of Indian Buddhist law codes (vinaya), Shayne Clarke dehorns the rhinoceros, revealing that in their own legal narratives, far from renouncing familial ties, Indian Buddhist writers take for granted the fact that monks and nuns would remain in contact with their families. The vision of the monastic life that emerges from Clarke's close reading of monastic law codes challenges some of our most basic scholarly notions of what it meant to be a Buddhist monk or nun in India around the turn of the Common Era. Not only do we see thick narratives depicting monks and nuns continuing to interact and associate with their families, but some are described as leaving home for the religious life with their children, and some as married monastic couples. Clarke argues that renunciation with or as a family is tightly woven into the very fabric of Indian Buddhist renunciation and monasticisms. Surveying the still largely uncharted terrain of Indian Buddhist monastic law codes preserved in Sanskrit, Tibetan, and Chinese, Clarke provides a comprehensive, pan-Indian picture of Buddhist monastic attitudes toward family. Whereas scholars have often assumed that monastic Buddhism must be anti-familial, he demonstrates that these assumptions were clearly not shared by the authors/redactors of Indian Buddhist monastic law codes. In challenging us to reconsider some of our most cherished assumptions concerning Indian Buddhist monasticisms, he provides a basis to rethink later forms of Buddhist monasticism such as those found in Central Asia, Kaśmīr, Nepal, and Tibet not in terms of corruption and decline but of continuity and development of a monastic or renunciant ideal that we have yet to understand fully.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the centuries leading up to the Sui reunification of China, and its wholesale promotion of Buddhism, Chinese Buddhists had often found themselves in a precarious position, politically speaking. While negative attitudes towards the foreign faith occasionally culminated in full-scale persecutions (such as the one enacted by the Tuoba/Northern Wei in 446), they more often simmered under the”
From Rhetorical uses of the exemplary child trope in the Biographies of Eminent Monks and Biographies of Nuns (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, S.
- Corresponding author
- Clarke, Shayne
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 2017-12-18
- OpenAlex
- W4302311614
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 14 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- Buddhist monastic discipline, monastic celibacy, renunciation, family ties, monks and nuns, Sanskrit texts, Tibetan texts, Chinese text
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780824840075
- The paper
- Clarke, S. (2017). Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms. University of Hawaii Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824840075