Cited by 10Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Killing, Lying, Stealing, and Adultery: A Problem of Interpretation in the Tantras

Broido, Michael M.·1988·Buddhist Hermeneutics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780824840310-006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basic Buddhist precepts-the injunctions against killing, stealing, lying, and so on-are inverted in the higher tantric tradition.

    “Basic Buddhist precepts-the well-known injunctions against killing, stealing, lying, and so on (Broido 1988)-are inverted in the higher tantric tradition.”

    From War Magic And Just War in Indian Tantric Buddhism (2016) · cites this paper as Broido 1988

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Broido, M. M.
Corresponding author
Broido, Michael M.
Venue
Buddhist Hermeneutics
Published
1988-12-31
Pages
71-118
OpenAlex
W4299545862
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Tantra, lying, theft, adultery, interpretation of religious texts, Hinduism, Buddhism, sexual ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review