The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CHAPTER 2 A Buddhist Response to the Confucian Revival: Tsan-ning and the Debate over Wen in the Early Sung
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mu Xiu was a strong advocate of the Classical Prose movement, which viewed Buddhism as an unwelcome influence on indigenous culture.
“The author of this inscription, Mu Xiu, was a strong advocate of the Classical Prose (guwen 古文) movement, which viewed Buddhism as an unwelcome influence on indigenous culture (Welter 1999: 25, 27; Halperin 2006: 7).”
From Originating in Emptiness, Present Everywhere: Representations of Song Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhist Bells in their Inscriptions (2020) · cites this paper as Welter 1999: 25, 27
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burdorf, S. (2020) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · doi:10.2143/jiabs.43.0.3289051
Metadata
- Authors
- Welter, A.
- Corresponding author
- Welter, Albert
- ORCID
- Welter, Albert
- Venue
- Buddhism in the Sung
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 1999-12-31
- Pages
- 21-61
- OpenAlex
- W4298741965
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2015: 13 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Confucian revival, Buddhist philosophy, early Song dynasty, Neo-Confucianism, literati culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
