The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Toward a Modern Chinese Buddhism: Taixu's Reforms
Abstract
The Venerable Master Taixu (1890–1947) is the most important and controversial Chinese Buddhist reformer of the twentieth century. Viewed as dangerously rash by conservative Buddhists, irrelevant by secular humanists, and spiritually misguided by Christian missionaries, Taixu was nevertheless committed to forging a socially engaged form of Buddhism and to organizing a Buddhist mission in the West. His bold and inventive "Buddhist revolution" continues to shape aspects of a revitalized Buddhism in East Asia and around the world. The present volume is the first major study in English to focus on the charismatic reformer and his teachings and provides a comprehensive and absorbing interpretation of Taixu’s aims and the divisive controversies that surrounded him. This nuanced work is richly documented with quotations from Taixu’s own writings and from various Chinese intellectuals and evangelists of the period. As the most politically involved of all the Buddhist leaders in the Republican period, Taixu sought to present Mahâyâna Buddhism as the core of a new Chinese culture and the only adequate foundation for a truly global civilization. Distancing himself from those masters who focused on otherworldly paradises and stressed dependence on celestial buddhas and bodhisattvas, he emphasized what could actually be accomplished in this world through the work of thousands of living bodhisattvas dedicated to building a pure land here and now. A realist who acknowledged the complexities…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Taixu's efforts were met with some resistance from more conservative Buddhists and non-Buddhist intellectuals.
“Taixu's efforts were met with some resistance from the more conservative Buddhists as well as by non-Buddhist intellectuals (Welch 1968; Pittman 2001).”
From Saving the soul in Red China: Music and ideology in the Gongde ritual of merit in Fujian (2002) · cites this paper as Pittman 2001
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittman, D. A.
- Corresponding author
- Pittman, Don A.
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 2017-12-18
- OpenAlex
- W4240036783
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 28.32
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Taixu, Chinese Buddhism, Buddhist reform, Mahayana Buddhism, Pure Land Buddhism, Republican China, Chinese intellectuals, utopianism, modern Chinese culture, Taiwanese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review