Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation
Abstract
In recent years, debate on the state's economic role has too often devolved into diatribes against intervention. Peter Evans questions such simplistic views, offering a new vision of why state involvement works in some cases and produces disasters in others. To illustrate, he looks at how state agencies, local entrepreneurs, and transnational corporations shaped the emergence of computer industries in Brazil, India, and Korea during the seventies and eighties. Evans starts with the idea that states vary in the way they are organized and tied to society. In some nations, like Zaire, the state is predatory, ruthlessly extracting and providing nothing of value in return. In others, like Korea, it is developmental, promoting industrial transformation. In still others, like Brazil and India, it is in between, sometimes helping, sometimes hindering. Evans's years of comparative research on the successes and failures of state involvement in the process of industrialization have here been crafted into a persuasive and entertaining work, which demonstrates that successful state action requires an understanding of its own limits, a realistic relationship to the global economy, and the combination of coherent internal organization and close links to society that Evans called "embedded autonomy."
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The developmental state gains high 'capacity' from institutional arrangements of 'embedded autonomy'.
“Third, the developmental state gains high 'capacity' from institutional arrangements of 'embedded autonomy', to use Peter Evans' apparently oxymoronic phrase (Evans, 1995; Woo, 1991).”
From The Developmental State: Dead or Alive? (2018) · cites this paper as Evans, 1995
Without effective institutions, state capacity alone cannot ensure structural transformation.
“Without effective institutions, state capacity alone cannot ensure structural transformation (Evans, 1995).”
From STATE CAPACITY, INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, AND STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (2026) · cites this paper as Evans, 1995
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 4,238
- Authors
- Evans, P. B.
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Peter B.
- ORCID
- Evans, Peter B.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2912536286
- Cited by
- 4,238
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 303 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 246 · 2019: 239 · 2018: 257 · 2017: 177 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 169 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 189 · 2012: 112
- FWCI
- 88.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Asian Industrial and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Brazilian History and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Keywords
- embedded autonomy, state intervention in the economy, industrialization, computer industry, state-business relations, multinational corporations, predatory state, developmental state, local entrepreneurs, comparative economic development, Brazil, India, South Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review