The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality
Abstract
Introduction: Criticism after Postcoloniality3Pt. 1Rationalities21Ch. 1Colonial Governmentality23Ch. 2Religion in Colonial Civil Society53Ch. 3The Government of Freedom70Pt. 2Histories91Ch. 4Dehistoricizing History93Ch. 5An Obscure Miracle of Connection106Pt. 3Futures129Ch. 6The Aftermaths of Sovereignty131Ch. 7Community, Number and the Ethos of Democracy158Ch. 8Fanonian Futures?190Coda: After Bandung: From the Politics of Colonial Representation to a Theory of Postcolonial Politics221Acknowledgements225Index227
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green governmentality: insights and opportunities in the study of nature's rule
Rutherford, S. (2007) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132507077080 · Cited by 391
Political Theory of Empire and Imperialism
Pitts, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.051508.214538 · Cited by 176
Zembylas, M. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094 · Cited by 142
Peace Love Yoga: The Politics of Global Spirituality
Jain, A. R. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190888626.001.0001 · Cited by 90
Cho, L. (2007) · TOPIA · doi:10.3138/topia.17.11 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, D.
- Venue
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1999-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W644442975
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400823062
- The paper
- Scott, D. (1999). Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
