The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy
Abstract
A landmark comparative history of Europe and China that examines why the Industrial Revolution emerged in the West The Great Divergence sheds light on one of the great questions of history: Why did sustained industrial growth begin in Northwest Europe? Historian Kenneth Pomeranz shows that as recently as 1750, life expectancy, consumption, and product and factor markets were comparable in Europe and East Asia. Moreover, key regions in China and Japan were no worse off ecologically than those in Western Europe, with each region facing corresponding shortages of land-intensive products. Pomeranz’s comparative lens reveals the two critical factors resulting in Europe's nineteenth-century divergence—the fortunate location of coal and access to trade with the New World. As East Asia’s economy stagnated, Europe narrowly escaped the same fate largely due to favorable resource stocks from underground and overseas. This Princeton Classics edition includes a preface from the author and makes a powerful historical work available to new readers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The answer must surely be no.”
From China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850 (2018) · cites this paper as Pomeranz (2000)
In the citing paper
“This means that it was not simply the result of factors such as coal and ghost acres, asPomeranz (2000) had argued, but was a longer run dynamic process, which can be seen as linked to the underlying institutional differences emphasised by western economic historians(Weber, 1930;Pirenne, 1939;Polanyi, 1944;Landes, 1969).”
From China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850 (2018) · cites this paper as Pomeranz (2000)
Citations
Cited by
China, Europe, and the Great Divergence: A Study in Historical National Accounting, 980–1850
Broadberry, S., Guan, H., & Li, D. D. (2018) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050718000529 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomeranz, K.
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2000-12-31
- Cited by
- 2,234
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.