Cited by 116Historical Philosophy and ScienceHistory and Developments in AstronomyHistory of Science and Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy

Martens, Rhonda·2001·Princeton University Press eBooks

Abstract

Johannes Kepler contributed importantly to every field he addressed. He changed the face of astronomy by abandoning principles that had been in place for two millennia, made important discoveries in optics and mathematics, and was an uncommonly good philosopher. Generally, however, Kepler's philosophical ideas have been dismissed as irrelevant and even detrimental to his legacy of scientific accomplishment. Here, Rhonda Martens offers the first extended study of Kepler's philosophical views and shows how those views helped him construct and justify the new astronomy. Martens notes that since Kepler became a Copernican before any empirical evidence supported Copernicus over the entrenched Ptolemaic system, his initial reasons for preferring Copernicanism were not telescope observations but rather methodological and metaphysical commitments. Further, she shows that Kepler's metaphysics supported the strikingly modern view of astronomical method that led him to discover the three laws of planetary motion and to wed physics and astronomy--a key development in the scientific revolution. By tracing the evolution of Kepler's thought in his astronomical, metaphysical, and epistemological works, Martens explores the complex interplay between changes in his philosophical views and the status of his astronomical discoveries. She shows how Kepler's philosophy paved the way for the discovery of elliptical orbits and provided a defense of physical astronomy's methodological soundness. In doing so, Martens demonstrates how an empirical discipline was inspired and profoundly shaped by philosophical assumptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400831098

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martens, R.
Corresponding author
Martens, Rhonda
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2001-01-01
OpenAlex
W1489712611
Cited by
116
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.95
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
Johannes Kepler, Copernicanism, Ptolemaic system, metaphysics, epistemology, astronomical methods, eccentric orbits, physical astronomy, scientific revolution, philosophy of science, optics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review