The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Judaism Became a Religion: An Introduction to Modern Jewish Thought
Abstract
A new approach to understanding Jewish thought since the eighteenth century Is Judaism a religion, a culture, a nationality—or a mixture of all of these? In How Judaism Became a Religion , Leora Batnitzky boldly argues that this question more than any other has driven modern Jewish thought since the eighteenth century. This wide-ranging and lucid introduction tells the story of how Judaism came to be defined as a religion in the modern period—and why Jewish thinkers have fought as well as championed this idea. Ever since the Enlightenment, Jewish thinkers have debated whether and how Judaism—largely a religion of practice and public adherence to law—can fit into a modern, Protestant conception of religion as an individual and private matter of belief or faith. Batnitzky makes the novel argument that it is this clash between the modern category of religion and Judaism that is responsible for much of the creative tension in modern Jewish thought. Tracing how the idea of Jewish religion has been defended and resisted from the eighteenth century to today, the book discusses many of the major Jewish thinkers of the past three centuries, including Moses Mendelssohn, Abraham Geiger, Hermann Cohen, Martin Buber, Zvi Yehuda Kook, Theodor Herzl, and Mordecai Kaplan. At the same time, it tells the story of modern orthodoxy, the German-Jewish renaissance, Jewish religion after the Holocaust, the emergence of the Jewish individual, the birth of Jewish nationalism, and Jewish religion in A…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, Jews generally self-define as a people (Hebrew: am) with a common language (Hebrew), ancestry (patriarchs and matriarchs; membership primarily, but not exclusively, based on descent), land (the land of Israel), and ethos (Tanakh/Talmud, variously interpreted) and not just as a community held together by faith (see Batnitzky 2011; Gottlieb 2011).”
From Supersessionism: Admit and Address Rather than Debate or Deny (2022) · cites this paper as Batnitzky 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Supersessionism: Admit and Address Rather than Debate or Deny
Levine, A.-J. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020155 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Batnitzky, L.
- Corresponding author
- Batnitzky, Leora
- ORCID
- Batnitzky, Leora
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2011-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4237399343
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Jewish Identity and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- modern Jewish thought, concept of religion, Enlightenment, Moses Mendelssohn, Abraham Geiger, Hermann Cohen, Martin Buber, Theodor Herzl, Mordecai Kaplan, Modern Orthodoxy, Zionism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review