CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Political Conflict and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy

Baum, Matthew A., Potter, Philip B. K.·2015·Princeton University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1515/9781400866472
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400866472

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A free media serves a fundamental role as a government watchdog.

    “a free media serves a fundamental role as a government watchdog”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Baum & Potter, 2015

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baum, M. A., & Potter, P. B. K.
ORCID
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Published
2015-12-31
DOI
10.1515/9781400866472
OpenAlex
W4234553599
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
war, democracy, democratic constraints, civil liberties, constitutional limits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review