Cited by 529Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Darwin's Unfinished Symphony: How Culture Made the Human Mind

Laland, Kevin N.·2017·Princeton University Press eBooks

Abstract

How culture transformed human evolution Humans possess an extraordinary capacity for cultural production, from the arts and language to science and technology. How did the human mind—and the uniquely human ability to devise and transmit culture—evolve from its roots in animal behavior? Darwin's Unfinished Symphony presents a captivating new theory of human cognitive evolution. This compelling and accessible book reveals how culture is not just the magnificent end product of an evolutionary process that produced a species unlike all others—it is also the key driving force behind that process. Kevin Laland shows how the learned and socially transmitted activities of our ancestors shaped our intellects through accelerating cycles of evolutionary feedback. The truly unique characteristics of our species—such as our intelligence, language, teaching, and cooperation—are not adaptive responses to predators, disease, or other external conditions. Rather, humans are creatures of their own making. Drawing on his own groundbreaking research, and bringing it to life with vivid natural history, Laland explains how animals imitate, innovate, and have remarkable traditions of their own. He traces our rise from scavenger apes in prehistory to modern humans able to design iPhones, dance the tango, and send astronauts into space. This book tells the story of the painstaking fieldwork, the key experiments, the false leads, and the stunning scientific breakthroughs that led to this new understan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400884872

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability to attribute thoughts, beliefs and mental states to others (theory of mind) facilitates social learning.

    “According to Laland (2017: 130), the ability to attribute thoughts, beliefs and mental states to others (theory of mind) facilitates social learning.”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Laland, 2017

  • Within familiar groups, humans learn about norms and taken-for-granted knowledge by horizontal and vertical transmission.

    “Within their familiar groups, humans learn about norms and taken-for-granted-knowledge by horizontal and vertical transmission (that is, across generations) (Laland, 2017;Richerson & Boyd, 2005).”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Laland, 2017

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 529

Authors
Laland, K. N.
Corresponding author
Laland, Kevin N.
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2017-12-31
OpenAlex
W4253128327
Cited by
529
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 36
FWCI
87.24
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
cultural evolution, human cognitive evolution, social learning, cultural transmission, imitation, innovation, animal traditions, evolutionary feedback, human intelligence, language evolution, teaching, cooperation, Darwinism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review