The DOI matches its Crossref record.
6.2 ‘Women and Everyday Spaces’
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but all the time being aware that in a post-conflict city bodies are not neutral, and women’s experiences can be quite different from those of white male philosophers (Rose 1999).”
From Material Dissonances in the Post-Conflict City: Re-Presencing Social Injustice in Belfast, Northern Ireland (2024) · cites this paper as Rose 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McAtackney, L. (2024) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-024-00497-5 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, G.
- Venue
- Feminist Theory and the Body
- Publisher
- Edinburgh University Press
- Published
- 1999-05-23
- Pages
- 359-370
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
