The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Muslim Cultures of the Indian Ocean: Diversity and Pluralism, Past and Present
Abstract
This book examines the role of Muslim communities in the emergence of connections and mobilities across the Indian Ocean World from a longue durée perspective. Spanning the 7th century through the medieval period until the present day, this book aims to move beyond the usual focus on geographical sub-regions to highlight different aspects of interconnectivity in relation to Islam. Analysing textual and material evidence, contributors examine identities and diasporas, manuscripts and literature, as well as vernacular and religious architecture. It aims to explore networks and circulations of peoples, ideas and ideologies, as well as art, culture, religion and heritage. It focuses on global interactions as well as local agencies in context.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By the ninth century ce, a whole new era of African maritime exchange is established, linked in no small part to the spread of Islam (for more details, see, most recently, Pradines & Topan 2023).”
From Recent Developments in the Archaeology of Long-Distance Connections Across the Ancient Indian Ocean (2023) · cites this paper as Pradines & Topan 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Developments in the Archaeology of Long-Distance Connections Across the Ancient Indian Ocean
Abraham, S. A. (2023) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110124 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Publisher
- Edinburgh University Press
- Published
- 2023-03-13
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review