The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chapter Five. The Economic Basis of Social Class
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It reflects not just income, but longer term economic security, stability and prospects, as reflected in a person's labour market position. It also reflects power in terms of relationships of authority, control and autonomy within the workplace (Goldthorpe & McKnight 2006).”
From Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics (2015) · cites this paper as Goldthorpe & McKnight 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics
Sullivan, A., & Brown, M. (2015) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3180 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldthorpe, J. H., & McKnight, A.
- ORCID
- Goldthorpe, John H.
- Venue
- Mobility and Inequality
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2006-02-13
- Pages
- 109-136
- OpenAlex
- W4206977089
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- social class, class structure, income inequality, wealth distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
