CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Ancient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Antiquity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cyrus II, Liberator or Conqueror? Ancient Historiography concerning Cyrus in Babylon

Vanderhooft, David·2006·Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period
DOI 10.1515/9781575065618-016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781575065618-016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Related

Metadata

Authors
Vanderhooft, D.
Corresponding author
Vanderhooft, David
ORCID
Vanderhooft, David
Venue
Judah and the Judeans in the Persian Period
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Published
2006-06-22
Pages
351-372
DOI
10.1515/9781575065618-016
OpenAlex
W3111358005
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.86
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Cyrus the Great, Babylon, ancient historiography, Achaemenid Persian Empire, Persian conquest, liberation narrative, Achaemenid historiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review