Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Types of loan: Matter and pattern

Sakel, Jeanette·2007·Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective

Abstract

A central concern of contact linguistics has long been to categorize the ways in which elements are borrowed from one language into another. For this pur-pose Matras and Sakel (2004) introduced the terms matter (MAT) and pattern(PAT) in the questionnaire on which the sample of contact situations in this book is based (cf. also subsequent publications on the issue, such as Matras and Sakel 2007). In the present chapter I will re-visit the definition of MAT and PAT, as well as address what this distinction could mean in phonology.I will furthermore give an overview of the overall distribution of MAT/PAT in the languages of the sample in order to address the validity of a MAT/PAT distinction in the categorization of contact situations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110199192.15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sakel, J.
Venue
Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
Published
2007-12-19
Pages
15-30
Cited by
89
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review