Cited by 202Memory, Trauma, and CommemorationLiterature and Cultural MemoryMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Literature, Film, and the Mediality of Cultural Memory

Erll, Astrid·2008·Cultural Memory Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110207262.6.389

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Erll, A.
Corresponding author
Erll, Astrid
Venue
Cultural Memory Studies
Published
2008-06-17
Pages
389-398
OpenAlex
W3200370884
Cited by
202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature and Cultural Memory
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
cultural memory, mediality, film and literature, intermediality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review