The DOI matches its Crossref record.
9. Phyla and Waves: Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As mentioned above, the definite article is not reconstructible to proto-Semitic, nor to proto-West Semitic; rather, the definite article, based on * han / hal , likely developed independently, though with contact leading to a consistent distribution across the Central Semitic languages (Pat-El 2009; Huehnergard and Rubin 2011: §7.4).”
From gahwat al-murra: the N + DEF-ADJ syntagm and the *at>ah shift in Arabic (2020) · cites this paper as Huehnergard and Rubin 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amorite: A Northwest Semitic Language?
Andrason, A., & Vita, J.-P. (2018) · Journal of Semitic Studies · doi:10.1093/jss/fgx035 · Cited by 4
gahwat al-murra: the N + DEF-ADJ syntagm and the *at>ah shift in Arabic
Stokes, P. W. (2020) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x19001125 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Huehnergard, J., & Rubin, A. D.
- ORCID
- Huehnergard, John
- Venue
- The Semitic Languages
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2011-12-21
- Pages
- 259-278
- OpenAlex
- W2488255218
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- Semitic languages, language classification, classification models, phyla, waves, historical linguistics, language families
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 9. Phyla and Waves: Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110251586.259
- The paper
- Huehnergard, J., & Rubin, A. D. (2011). 9. Phyla and Waves: Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages. The Semitic Languages. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110251586.259
