CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Language, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

30. Late Imperial Aramaic

Gzella, Holger·2011·The Semitic Languages
DOI 10.1515/9783110251586.598
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110251586.598

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gzella, H.
Corresponding author
Gzella, Holger
Venue
The Semitic Languages
Publisher
DE GRUYTER
Published
2011-12-21
Pages
598-609
DOI
10.1515/9783110251586.598
OpenAlex
W2491415035
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Aramaic, Aramaic inscriptions, Late Antique period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review