Cited by 10Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyMental Health and Psychiatry

The Paradoxes of Subjectivity and the Projective Structure of Consciousness

Kenneth Williford, David Rudrauf, Gregory Landini·2012·Consciousness and Subjectivity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110325843.321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Projective geometry accounts for certain puzzling features of consciousness that stem from its perspectival character.

    “We argue that projective geometry accounts for certain puzzling features of consciousness that stem from its perspectival character”

    From The Projective Consciousness Model and Phenomenal Selfhood (2018) · cites this paper as Williford et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 10

Authors
Williford, K., Rudrauf, D., & Landini, G.
Venue
Consciousness and Subjectivity
Publisher
De Gruyter
Published
2012-12-31
Pages
321-354
OpenAlex
W183470731
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
subjectivity, consciousness, projective structures, phenomenology, self-consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review