The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manuscript, Print and Memory: Relics of the Cankam in Tamilnadu
Abstract
The ancient Tamil poetic corpus of the Caṅam ("The Academy") is a national treasure for Tamilians and a battle-ground for linguists and historians of politics, culture and literature. Going back to oral predecessors probably dating back to the beginning of the first millennium, it has had an extremely rich and variegated history. Collected into anthologies and endowed with literary theories and voluminous commentaries, it became the centre-piece of the Tamil literary canon, associated with the royal court of the Pandya dynasty in Madurai. Its decline began in the late middle ages, and by the late 17th century it had fallen into near oblivion, before being rediscovered at the beginning of the print era. The present study traces the complex historical process of its transmission over some 2000 years, using and documenting a wide range of sources, in particular surviving manuscripts, the early prints, the commentaries of the literary and grammatical traditions and a vast range of later literature that creates a web of inter-textual references and quotations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“I agree with scholars who have argued that the earliest Tamil poems-the so-called Can ˙kam poems-were full-fledged participants in the wider k ā vya movement”
From Making It Nice: Kāvya in the Second Century (2019) · cites this paper as Wilden (2014)
In the citing paper
“I consider it likely that some of these poems, such as those of the Ku ṟ untokai , were composed in the second century.”
From Making It Nice: Kāvya in the Second Century (2019) · cites this paper as Wilden (2014)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making It Nice: Kāvya in the Second Century
Ollett, A. (2019) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-018-09378-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilden, E. M.
- Corresponding author
- Wilden, Eva Maria
- ORCID
- Wilden, Eva Maria
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2014-10-24
- OpenAlex
- W366237114
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- Tamil poetry, Pandya dynasty, Madurai, manuscript transmission, early printing, literary canon, intertextuality, literary commentary, oral tradition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review