The Experientiality of Narrative: An Enactivist Approach
Abstract
Recent developments in cognitive narrative theory have called attention to readers' active participation in making sense of narrative. However, while most psychologically inspired models address interpreters' subpersonal (i.e., unconscious) responses, the experiential level of their engagement with narrative remains relatively undertheorized. Building on theories of experience and embodiment within today's "second-generation" cognitive science, and opening a dialogue with so-called "enactivist" philosophy, this book sets out to explore how narrative experiences arise from the interaction between textual cues and readers' past experiences. Caracciolo's study offers a phenomenologically inspired account of narrative, spanning a wide gamut of responses such as the embodied dynamic of imagining a fictional world, empathetic perspective-taking in relating to characters, and "higher-order" evaluations and interpretations. Only by placing a premium on how such modes of engagement are intertwined in experience, Caracciolo argues, can we do justice to narrative's psychological and existential impact on our lives. These insights are illustrated through close readings of literary texts ranging from Émile Zola's Germinal to José Saramago's Blindness .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Readers respond to narrative on the basis of their experiential background.
“In this book, he states that “readers respond to narrative on the basis of their experiential background” (Caracciolo, 2014).”
From Interactive Digital Narratives as Complex Expressive Means (2022) · cites this paper as Caracciolo, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Personal Relevance in Story Reading
Kuzmičová, A., & Bálint, K. (2019) · Poetics Today · doi:10.1215/03335372-7558066 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Interactive Digital Narratives as Complex Expressive Means
Bellini, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.854960 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Indeed, enactivism offers a further suggestion that could be insightful in the current analysis: the assumed structural resemblance between real, perceptual experiences and imaginative, fi ctional ones (cf. Caracciolo, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Caracciolo, M.
- Corresponding author
- Caracciolo, Marco
- ORCID
- Caracciolo, Marco
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2014-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W611795735
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Keywords
- narrative experience, embodiment, enactivism, perspective taking, empathy, imagination, reader engagement, phenomenology of narrative, literary interpretation, Germinal, blindness, Émile Zola, José Saramago
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review