CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Reformation and Early Modern ChristianityBiblical Studies and InterpretationKarl Barth and Christian Theology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hat Luther Paulus missverstanden? Reformation als Paulusinterpretation und die Diskussion um die Bedeutung der reformatorischen Rechtfertigungslehre

Frey, Jörg·2018·500 Jahre Reformation
DOI 10.1515/9783110542417-004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110542417-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Frey, J.
Corresponding author
Frey, Jörg
ORCID
Frey, Jörg
Venue
500 Jahre Reformation
Publisher
De Gruyter
Published
2018-09-10
Pages
49-78
DOI
10.1515/9783110542417-004
OpenAlex
W2890110451
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
Martin Luther, Paul the Apostle, Pauline theology, justification by faith, Reformation, Reformation theology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review