The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Diagram Method for 3-folds and its application to the Kähler cone and Picard number of Calabi-Yau 3-folds. I
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If R is an extremal ray of NE(X/U ) that is (K X + ∆)-negative, then there is a rational curve Σ spanning R, such that 0 < -(K X + ∆) • Σ ≤ 2n.”
From Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type (2009) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type
Birkar, C., Cascini, P., Hacon, C., & McKernan, J. (2009) · Journal of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-09-00649-3 · Cited by 1,278
Shokurov, V. V. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf02362335 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikulin, V. V.
- Corresponding author
- Nikulin, Viacheslav V
- Venue
- Higher Dimensional Complex Varieties
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2012-03-24
- OpenAlex
- W2490916850
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometry and complex manifolds
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Algebra and Number Theory › Advanced Algebra and Geometry
- Keywords
- diagram method, Calabi-Yau threefolds, Kähler cone, Picard number
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Diagram Method for 3-folds and its application to the Kähler cone and Picard number of Calabi-Yau 3-folds. I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110814736.261
- The paper
- Nikulin, V. V. (2012). The Diagram Method for 3-folds and its application to the Kähler cone and Picard number of Calabi-Yau 3-folds. I. Higher Dimensional Complex Varieties. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814736.261
