Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical and Linguistic StudiesClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Text und Überlieferung des Buches Tobit

Hallermayer, Michaela·2007·De Gruyter eBooks
DOI 10.1515/9783110896671
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This thesis examines the history of the text and transmission of the Book of Tobit. In the Greek Bible, there are two different versions of the Book of Tobit, and these are related here to the fragments of the story of Tobit found in Qumran. The study aims to determine the original form of the text of the Book of Tobit and to draw conclusions about the way ancient translators worked and about the origins of this biblical narrative.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783110896671

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 7

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hallermayer, M.
Corresponding author
Hallermayer, Michaela
Venue
De Gruyter eBooks
Publisher
DE GRUYTER
Published
2007-12-31
DOI
10.1515/9783110896671
OpenAlex
W623760666
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
Book of Tobit, textual transmission, Greek Bible, Dead Sea Scrolls, Bible translation, textual criticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.