The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Syncellus, Georgius: Ecloga chronographica
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–110 of 110
(2023) · Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks · doi:10.13109/9783666500022.643
Cassia, M. (2023) · Queenship and power · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28651-3_1
Archanioł Gabriel w piśmiennictwie qumrańskim
Domka, N. (2024) · The Biblical Annals · doi:10.31743/biban.14937
(2023) · Studia traditionis theologiae · doi:10.1484/m.stt-eb.5.138054
Attali, M. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5d2b6bcdz46e8z41d4z8f61z4c94da13e47b
Sarapis et le paysage politique et religieux en Égypte hellénistique : permanences et métamorphoses
Dionysopoulou, E. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9bc7091bzbef1z4399zb3c1z1846aca8c360
Metadata
- Authors
- Syncellus, G., & Mosshammer, A. A.
- Corresponding author
- Georgius Syncellus
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2497108024
- Semantic Scholar
- f90840ad5d71bb7462cba8c94e41618f383595ce
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- Byzantine history, Byzantine Empire, Byzantine emperors, Byzantine chronicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review