Generation of glycogen- and albumin-producing hepatocyte-like cells from embryonic stem cells
Abstract
We present a novel two-step protocol for the differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into the hepatic lineage. Differentiated hepatocyte-like cells express genes and proteins characteristic for endodermal and hepatic cells and acquire a functional hepatic phenotype as demonstrated by albumin secretion and glycogen storage. During differentiation, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, transthyretin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, cytochrome P450 subunits 2b9 and 2b13 and tyrosine aminotransferase transcripts are upregulated. Quantitative RT-PCR data revealed a fetal hepatic phenotype corresponding to day 13-14 of liver development. Terminally differentiated hepatocyte-like cells show a bi-nucleated, cuboidal morphology labeled by albumin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, liver amylase, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, c-met and cytokeratin 18. ES-derived intermediate cell types transiently and partially co-express nestin with albumin and alpha-fetoprotein, respectively, but not cytokeratin 19. This finding suggests an ES-derived potential hepatic progenitor cell type, which is partially nestin-, albumin- and alpha-fetoprotein-positive, but cytokeratin 19-negative.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Immunohistochemical analyses of hiPSC-derived MPS tissue sections confirmed dense continuous tissue with clear protein expression of hepatocyte markers ALB and CK18.
“Furthermore, immunohistochemical analyses of hiPSC-derived MPS tissue sections confirmed the formation of a dense continuous tissue with clear protein expression of the hepatocyte markers ALB and CK18 [31] ( Fig. 4 e).”
From 3D microperfusion of mesoscale human microphysiological liver models improves functionality and recapitulates hepatic zonation (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data
Moon, K. R., van Dijk, D., Wang, Z., Gigante, S., Burkhardt, D. B., Chen, W. S., Yim, K., Elzen, A. V. D., Hirn, M. J., Coifman, R. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0336-3 · Cited by 1,065 · see citing works
Wesseler, M. F., Taebnia, N., Harrison, S., Youhanna, S., Preiss, L. C., Kemas, A. M., Vegvari, A., Mokry, J., Sullivan, G. J., Lauschke, V. M., et al. (2023) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.022 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kania, G., Blyszczuk, P., Jochheim, A., Ott, M., & Wobus, A. M.
- Venue
- Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1431-6730
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review