The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Tumor-associated MUC1 glycopeptide epitopes are not subject to self-tolerance and improve responses to MUC1 peptide epitopes in MUC1 transgenic mice
Open accessAbstract
Human adenocarcinomas overexpress a hypoglycosylated, tumor-associated form of the mucin-like glycoprotein MUC1 containing abnormal mono- and disaccharide antigens, such as Tn, sialyl-Tn, and TF, as well as stretches of unglycosylated protein backbone in the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) region. Both peptide and glycopeptide epitopes generated from the VNTR are candidates for cancer vaccines and we performed experiments to evaluate their relative potential to elicit tumor-MUC1-specific immunity. We show here that immunization with the 100 amino acid-long VNTR peptide (MUC1p) elicits weaker responses in MUC1 transgenic mice compared to wild type mice suggesting self-tolerance. In contrast, when glycosylated with tumor-associated Tn antigen (GalNAc-O-S/T), TnMUC1 induces glycopeptide-specific T cell and antibody responses in both strains of mice and helps enhance responses to MUC1p in MUC1 transgenic mice. Using newly derived MUC1-specific mouse T cell hybridomas we show that the only antigen-presenting cells able to cross-present TnMUC1 glycopeptide are dendritic cells (DCs). This is likely due to their exclusive expression of receptors capable of binding TnMUC1. We conclude that MUC1 glycopeptides induce stronger immunity in MUC1-Tg mice because they are recognized as `foreign' rather than `self' and because they are cross-presented preferentially by DCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1864 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi0353070 · DOI
- 10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3395 · DOI
- Deck M.B., 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 4740, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.8.4740 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2008-05-157396 · DOI
- Gerloni M., 2005, J. Immunol., 175, 6551, 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6551 · DOI
- 10.1006/jsre.1996.0264 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.194.6.769 · DOI
- Hiltbold E.M., 2000, J. Immunol., 165, 3730, 10.4049/jimmunol.165.7.3730 · DOI
- Jerome K.R., 1991, Cancer Res., 51, 2908
- Jerome K.R., 1993, J. Immunol., 151, 1654, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.3.1654 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00616.x · DOI
- 10.1038/ni1265 · DOI
- Lepisto A.J., 2008, Cancer Ther., 6, 955
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1035 · DOI
- Nichols L.A., 2007, J. Immunol., 179, 993, 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.993 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00737-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00262-004-0581-1 · DOI
- Reilly R.T., 2000, Cancer Res., 60, 3569
- Rowse G.J., 1998, Cancer Res., 58, 315
- 10.1159/000097020 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00262-006-0274-z · DOI
- Soares M.M., 2001, J. Immunol., 166, 6555, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6555 · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/cwj044 · DOI
- 10.1007/s001090050144 · DOI
- 10.1093/glycob/cwl061 · DOI
- Tempero R.M., 1998, J. Immunol., 161, 5500, 10.4049/jimmunol.161.10.5500 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M203774200 · DOI
- Turner M.S., 2007, J. Immunol., 178, 2787, 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2787 · DOI
- Valladeau J., 2001, J. Immunol., 167, 5767, 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5767 · DOI
- Vlad A.M., 2004, Breast Dis., 20, 73, 10.3233/BD-2004-20109 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20020493 · DOI
- White J., 1989, J. Immunol., 143, 1822, 10.4049/jimmunol.143.6.1822 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20031865 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0604045103 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, S. O., Vlad, A. M., Islam, K., Gariépy, J., & Finn, O. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- bchm
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2009-05-09
- Volume
- 390
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 611-618
- ISSN
- 1431-6730 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4315
- PMC
- PMC4729297
- OpenAlex
- W2113248950
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Breast Cancer Alliance
- Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA168392, P01CA073743, R01CA056103, T32CA082084)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Keywords
- MUC1, Tn antigen, self-tolerance, variable number tandem repeats, cancer vaccines, dendritic cells, cross-presentation, T cell hybridomas, antigen-presenting cells, sialyl-Tn, TF antigen, tumor-specific immunity
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibody Specificity, Epitopes, B-Lymphocytes, Cross Reactions, Dendritic Cells, Glycopeptides, Glycosylation, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccination, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Self Tolerance, Antigen Presentation, Mucin-1, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review