Cited by 40Political Economy and MarxismSocial and Economic SolidarityCooperative Studies and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income

Open access
Casassas, David·2016·Basic Income Studies

Abstract

Let us understand economic democracy as the fourfold capacity (i) to decide what social relations we wish to “enter” in order to work; (ii) to determine the (im)material nature of the space where we decide to stay and work, which requires the capacity of having a “voice” that is effectively listened to; (iii) to opt for “exiting” this space in case its nature and functioning go against what we wish for our lives; and (iv) in case we opt for leaving, to resort to an outside-the-previous-workplace offering tools for second and subsequent opportunities, that is, to effectively “restart” our (re)productive lives in other terms and conditions. Basic income can play a crucial role in fostering such capacity. Because of its unconditionality, and thanks to bargaining power deriving from it, basic income is a sort of income that is convertible in terms of (a) time to conceive of (and put into practice) projects of one’s own, be it individually and/or collectively; (b) a capacity to explore alternative options and take promising risks; and (c) the right to credit, in the twofold sense of the right to financial resources and the right to social trust. As noticed and appreciated by some post-crash social movements, there are some spheres where such democracy-enhancing bargaining power may unfold: wage-earning work, the decommodification of labour force and the possible subsequent constitution of cooperatives and other self-managed (re)productive spaces, the household, entrepreneurship, socio-political participation, etc. In sum, more flexible combinations of different kinds of work may emerge when individuals and groups enjoy an income stream that is guaranteed as a right, which echoes both classical and contemporary discourses on the need for humans to have the democratic right to autonomously choose and determine work(s) all along the life cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/bis-2016-0007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Casassas, D., & Loewe, G. (2001). Renta Básica y fuerza negociadora de los trabajadores. In D. Raventós (coord.), La Renta Básica. Por una ciudadanía más libre, más igualitaria y más fraternal (pp. 205–222). Barcelona: Ariel.
  2. Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  3. Harrington, J. (1992) [1656]. In J. G. A. Pocock (ed.), The commonwealth of Oceana and a system of politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  4. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Herzog, L. (2015): “Epistemic Equality and the Regulation of Companies”. Paper presented at the Workshop “Justice and Democracy in the Firm”, Universitat de Barcelona, 7 September 2015.
  7. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
  9. Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press.
  10. Standing, G. (2009). Work after globalization. Building occupational citizenship. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar. · DOI
  11. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury. · DOI
  12. Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. · DOI
  13. Widerquist, K. (2013). Independence, propertylessness, and basic income. A theory of freedom as the power to say no. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  14. Zunz, O. Schoppa, L. and Hiwatari, N. (eds.) (2004). Social contracts under stress: The middle classes of America, Europe, and Japan at the turn of the century. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Metadata

Authors
Casassas, D.
Affiliations
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Casassas, David
Venue
Basic Income Studies
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1932-0183 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-6094
OpenAlex
W2463078194
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Basic Income Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
Keywords
economic sovereignty, economic democracy, basic income, democratization of work, right to work, bargaining power, cooperatives, right to autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/bis-2016-0007
The paper
Casassas, D. (2016). Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income. Basic Income Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0007