The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income
Open accessAbstract
Let us understand economic democracy as the fourfold capacity (i) to decide what social relations we wish to “enter” in order to work; (ii) to determine the (im)material nature of the space where we decide to stay and work, which requires the capacity of having a “voice” that is effectively listened to; (iii) to opt for “exiting” this space in case its nature and functioning go against what we wish for our lives; and (iv) in case we opt for leaving, to resort to an outside-the-previous-workplace offering tools for second and subsequent opportunities, that is, to effectively “restart” our (re)productive lives in other terms and conditions. Basic income can play a crucial role in fostering such capacity. Because of its unconditionality, and thanks to bargaining power deriving from it, basic income is a sort of income that is convertible in terms of (a) time to conceive of (and put into practice) projects of one’s own, be it individually and/or collectively; (b) a capacity to explore alternative options and take promising risks; and (c) the right to credit, in the twofold sense of the right to financial resources and the right to social trust. As noticed and appreciated by some post-crash social movements, there are some spheres where such democracy-enhancing bargaining power may unfold: wage-earning work, the decommodification of labour force and the possible subsequent constitution of cooperatives and other self-managed (re)productive spaces, the household, entrepreneurship, socio-political participation, etc. In sum, more flexible combinations of different kinds of work may emerge when individuals and groups enjoy an income stream that is guaranteed as a right, which echoes both classical and contemporary discourses on the need for humans to have the democratic right to autonomously choose and determine work(s) all along the life cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“UBI could improve democracy as it would give people greater freedom over their use of time and hence greater capacity to participate in democratic processes (Casassas, 2016; Ravent ´ os, 2007).”
From Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare? (2021) · cites this paper as Casassas, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Casassas, D., & Loewe, G. (2001). Renta Básica y fuerza negociadora de los trabajadores. In D. Raventós (coord.), La Renta Básica. Por una ciudadanía más libre, más igualitaria y más fraternal (pp. 205–222). Barcelona: Ariel.
- Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Harrington, J. (1992) [1656]. In J. G. A. Pocock (ed.), The commonwealth of Oceana and a system of politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Herzog, L. (2015): “Epistemic Equality and the Regulation of Companies”. Paper presented at the Workshop “Justice and Democracy in the Firm”, Universitat de Barcelona, 7 September 2015.
- Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press.
- Standing, G. (2009). Work after globalization. Building occupational citizenship. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar. · DOI
- Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury. · DOI
- Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. · DOI
- Widerquist, K. (2013). Independence, propertylessness, and basic income. A theory of freedom as the power to say no. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- Zunz, O. Schoppa, L. and Hiwatari, N. (eds.) (2004). Social contracts under stress: The middle classes of America, Europe, and Japan at the turn of the century. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Metadata
- Authors
- Casassas, D.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Casassas, David
- ORCID
- Casassas, David
- Venue
- Basic Income Studies
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2016-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1932-0183 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-6094
- OpenAlex
- W2463078194
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Basic Income Studies (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Solidarity
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
- Keywords
- economic sovereignty, economic democracy, basic income, democratization of work, right to work, bargaining power, cooperatives, right to autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/bis-2016-0007
- The paper
- Casassas, D. (2016). Economic Sovereignty as the Democratization of Work: The Role of Basic Income. Basic Income Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0007