The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ulva lactuca Biofilters for Marine Fishpond Effluents. I. Ammonia Uptake Kinetics and Nitrogen Content
Abstract
The potential of the seaweed Ulva lactuca as a biofilter for effluents of intensive marine fishponds in arid regions has been studied in Eilat, Israel. One kg (wet wt) nor2 of Ulva in 1 m2 tanks 60 cm deep, removed, during the day, over 90 percent of the ammonia from the fishpond effluents, at inflow fluxes up to 10 μιηο1β5 L1 h1 (0.14 mole m^d1)· At fluxes of 40μπιοΐ68 L1 h~3 (0.58 mole m2d1)9 nearly 40 percent were removed. Night time ammonia removal remained efficient at low ammonia fluxes. Ammonia uptake rate and percent nitrogen (N) in dry weight (DW) of the seaweed showed hyperbolic correlations with ammonia flux through the tanks. The data fitted the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with a maximal uptake rate of 28 μηιοΐβδ L1 h1 (0.4 mole m~2d1). Pulse ammonia uptake rate was approximately four times that of continuous uptake. Maximal percent N in DW of U. lactuca, when stocked at 1 kg m 2, was 4.07. Increased stocking density (2, 4 and 6 kg m2) did not significantly affect ammonia uptake rate per tank. However, N-content was significantly higher, averaging 5.5 percent of DW. The data indicate that at low ammonia fluxes (below 10 μιηο1β8 L1 h1) U. lactuca was N-limited and that at higher fluxes the algae became gradually light limited. Our results indicate that 10m2 of Ulva biofilter can remove from the effluents of our intensive grow-out ponds over 90 percent of the ammonia produced by 1 kg of daily feed ration or by approximately 75 kg of fish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neori, A., Chopin, T., Troell, M., Buschmann, A. H., Kraemer, G. P., Halling, C., Shpigel, M., & Yarish, C. (2004) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.015 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationStructure and Functional Properties of Ulvan, a Polysaccharide from Green Seaweeds
Lahaye, M., & Robic, A. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061185q · Cited by 1,019
Integrating seaweeds into marine aquaculture systems: a key toward sustainability.
Chopin, T., Buschmann, A. H., Halling, C., Troell, M., Kautsky, N., Neori, A., Kraemer, G. P., Zertuche‐González, J. A., Yarish, C., & Neefus, C. (2001) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01137.x · Cited by 765
Self-citationTroell, M., Joyce, A., Chopin, T., Neori, A., Buschmann, A. H., & Fang, J.-G. (2009) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.09.010 · Cited by 689
Self-citationUse of macroalgae for marine biomass production and CO2 remediation: a review
Gao, K., & McKinley, K. R. (1994) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/bf02185904 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, I., & Neori, A.
- Venue
- Botanica Marina
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0006-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4323
- OpenAlex
- W1990837272
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ulva lactuca Biofilters for Marine Fishpond Effluents. I. Ammonia Uptake Kinetics and Nitrogen Content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/botm.1991.34.6.475
- The paper
- Cohen, I., & Neori, A. (1991). Ulva lactuca Biofilters for Marine Fishpond Effluents. I. Ammonia Uptake Kinetics and Nitrogen Content. Botanica Marina. https://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1991.34.6.475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.