Cited by 12Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Harmonisation of serum dihydrotestosterone analysis: establishment of an external quality assurance program

Greaves, Ronda F., Jolly, Lisa, Hartmann, Michaela F., Ho, Chung Shun, Kam, Richard K.T., Joseph, John, Boyder, Conchita, Wudy, Stefan A.·2017·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is an important analyte for the clinical assessment of disorders of sex development. It is also reportedly a difficult analyte to measure. Currently, there are significant gaps in the standardisation of this analyte, including no external quality assurance (EQA) program available worldwide to allow for peer review performance of DHT. We therefore proposed to establish a pilot EQA program for serum DHT. METHODS: DHT was assessed in the 2015 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs' Endocrine program material. The material's target (i.e. "true") values were established using a measurement procedure based on isotope dilution gas chromatography (GC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). DHT calibrator values were based on weighed values of pure DHT material (>97.5% purity) from Sigma. The allowable limits of performance (ALP) were established as ±0.1 up to 0.5 nmol/L and ±15% for targets >0.5 nmol/L. RESULTS: Target values for the six levels of RCPAQAP material for DHT ranged from 0.02 to 0.43 nmol/L (0.01-0.12 ng/mL). The material demonstrated linearity across the six levels. There were seven participating laboratories for this pilot study. Results of the liquid chromatography (LC) MS/MS methods were within the ALP; whereas the results from the immunoassay methods were consistently higher than the target values and outside the ALP. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides the first peer comparison of serum DHT measured by mass spectrometry (MS) and immunoassay laboratories. Establishment of this program provides one of the pillars to achieve method harmonisation. This supports accurate clinical decisions where DHT measurement is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2016-0394

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In combination with MS as the detection method, GC-MS presents a robust analytical tool, unsurpassed in determining simultaneously a multitude of steroids including precursors or metabolites of progestins, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, androgens and estrogens.

    “In combination with MS as the detection method, GC-MS presents a robust analytical tool, unsurpassed in determining simultaneously a multitude of steroids including precursors or metabolites of progestins, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids (all C21-steroids), androgens (C19-steroids) and estrogens (C18steroids) (289,290).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 12

Authors
Greaves, R. F., Jolly, L., Hartmann, M. F., Ho, C. S., Kam, R. K. T., Joseph, J., Boyder, C., & Wudy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (AU)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Pathwest Laboratory Medicine (AU)
Corresponding author
Greaves, Ronda F.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
522-529
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W2514135703
Cited by
12
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
external quality assurance, method harmonization, disorders of sex development, immunoassay comparison, reference materials
MeSH terms
Calibration, Chromatography, Liquid, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunoassay, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pilot Projects, Quality Control, Radioimmunoassay, Dihydrotestosterone, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Laboratory Proficiency Testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review