Clinical autoantibody detection by microarray
Open accessAbstract
Background: AMiDot is a microdot array-based immunoassay that allows simultaneous detection of multiple autoantibodies on a single patient. We evaluated the AMiDot “Systemic Autoimmune Disease” (SAD) panel, which detects antibodies to 17 different antigens. Methods: AMiDot was performed on 184 samples from blood donors and on 280 randomly selected clinical samples containing antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens or to dsDNA. The results obtained by AMiDot on the clinical samples were compared to results obtained by EliA (Thermo Fisher) for anti-Ro60, anti-La, anti-RNP, anti-Scl-70, anti-CENPB, anti-Sm, and anti-Jo-1 and by Farr assay for anti-dsDNA. Discordant results were further analyzed by immunodot (D-tek). Results: Concordance between AMiDot and EliA was ≥87% and κ agreement ≥0.44. When compared to EliA and immunodot (in case of discordance between AMiDot and EliA), concordance improved to ≥91% and κ agreement to ≥0.77. The sensitivity of AMiDot (compared to EliA and immunodot, in case of discordance between AMiDot and EliA) was ≥93%, except for anti-Ro60 (84%). The concordance and κ agreement of AMiDot with the Farr assay (for dsDNA antibodies) was, respectively, 84% and 0.33. The sensitivity of AMiDot for dsDNA (compared to Farr assay) was 25%. The specificity was ≥97% (in blood donors as well as in clinical samples). The within-run imprecision was 9%–27% and the between-run imprecision 29%–39%. Conclusions: AMiDot offers an alternative to line immunodot assay. Individual antibody assays might suffer from low sensitivity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AMiDot showed only mild agreement for anti-dsDNA antibody measurements with Farr.
“AMiDot, a microdot array that detects antibodies to 17 different antigens showed only mild agreement for anti-dsDNA antibody measurements with Farr [69].”
From Laboratory evaluation of anti-dsDNA antibodies. (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Dillaerts, D., De Baere, H., & Bossuyt, X.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Bossuyt, Xavier
- ORCID
- Bossuyt, Xavier
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 578-585
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W2521225301
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Keywords
- autoantibody detection, anti-dsDNA antibodies, extractable nuclear antigens, anti-Scl-70 antibodies, anti-Jo-1 antibodies, assay concordance, assay sensitivity and specificity, Farr assay
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Autoimmune Diseases, DNA, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antigens, Nuclear, Protein Array Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review