Influence of age, gender and body mass index on late-night salivary cortisol in healthy adults
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) is one of the most reliable tests to screen for endogenous Cushing syndrome. This test is simple, inexpensive and noninvasive and has high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our study was to analyze the putative influence of age, gender and body mass index (BMI) on LNSC levels in a healthy population. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in healthy adults. Midnight saliva samples were collected at home. Participants refrained from teeth brushing, eating or drinking for 2 h prior to collection. Salivary cortisol measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (number 140073). RESULTS: We evaluated 122 nonsmoking healthy volunteers. Mean age was 35±14 years (range, 18-74 years); 63% were women. Mean BMI was 24±3 kg/m2, blood pressure 115/74 mmHg and fasting plasma glucose 4.8±0.5 mmol/L. LNSC presented a non-Gaussian distribution; the median was 3.58 (range, 0.55-8.55) nmol/L (0.13 [range, 0.02-0.31] μg/dL), and the 97.5th percentile (P97.5) was 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 μg/dL). Multiple linear regression disclosed a significant positive association between salivary cortisol levels and age (r2=0.21, p<0.001), but no association with gender (p=0.105) or BMI (p=0.119). Accordingly, participants aged >50 years had significantly higher salivary cortisol as compared to those aged <50 years (5.24 nmol/L [0.19 μg/dL] vs. 3.31 nmol/L [0.12 μg/dL], respectively, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum reference value (P97.5) of LNSC was set at 8.3 nmol/L (0.3 μg/dL) using ECLIA. Advanced age was associated with higher LNSC levels, with no evident influence of gender or BMI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Salivary cortisol has been shown to be less affected by CBG alterations than plasma cortisol.
“Analysis of salivary cortisol has been proposed as an alternative to analyzing plasma free cortisol and has been shown to be less affected by CBG alterations (9, 14, 20-25).”
From Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Can Circumvent Confounding Effects of Oral Contraceptives in the Short Synacthen Test (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Coelli, S., Farias, C. B., Soares, A. A., Crescente, G. M., Hirakata, V. N., Souza, L. B., Czepielewski, M. A., Camargo, J. L., & Silveiro, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Silveiro, Sandra Pinho
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1954-1961
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W2613514801
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- late-night salivary cortisol, reference values, body mass index, sex differences, healthy adults, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, non-Gaussian distributions, healthy volunteers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Saliva, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review