The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inherent biological variation and reference values
Abstract
There is a need for revisiting theoretical concepts and practical applications of conventional population-based reference values to make for better clinical use of laboratory data. Knowledge of the underlying biological variation of quantities examined in medical laboratories is vital to understanding the proper generation and application of traditional population-based reference values. Appreciation of the biological changes that occur over the span of life is a necessary prerequisite to deciding whether stratification of reference values according to age is likely to be necessary. Knowledge of the detail of predictable biological cyclical rhythms is required for correct clinical interpretation of laboratory data and appropriate collection of specimens at times relevant to the clinical purpose. Quantitative data on inherent within- and between-subject biological components of variation have shown the marked individuality of most quantities of interest in laboratory medicine. This individuality casts light on why examinations are not generally very successfully applied in population screening or case-finding. Consideration of individuality demonstrates why stratification of reference values is often very advantageous. Individuality provides an indisputable argument for better use of individual specific reference values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friedrichs, K. R., Harr, K. E., Freeman, K. P., Szladovits, B., Walton, R. M., Barnhart, K. F., & Blanco‐Chavez, J. (2012) · Veterinary Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1111/vcp.12006 · Cited by 1,293
Dehydration: Physiology, Assessment, and Performance Effects
Cheuvront, S. N., & Kenefick, R. W. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130017 · Cited by 461
Fraser, C. G. (2012) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/cclm.2011.733 · Cited by 286
Self-citationReference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
Ozarda, Y. (2016) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2016.001 · Cited by 264
Reference intervals: the way forward
Ceriotti, F., Hinzmann, R., & Panteghini, M. (2009) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008170 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, C. G.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2004-01-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 758-64
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W2064715546
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inherent biological variation and reference values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/cclm.2004.128
- The paper
- Fraser, C. G. (2004). Inherent biological variation and reference values. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2004.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.