Cited by 45Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Free serum cortisol: quantification applying equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration and an automated immunoassay system

Vogeser, Michael, Möhnle, Patrick, Briegel, Josef·2007·Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Quantification of bioactive, free serum cortisol concentrations can characterize adrenocortical function more appropriately compared to total serum cortisol measurement. Ultrafiltration or equilibrium dialysis of serum samples allow direct measurement of free serum cortisol concentrations but respective methods have poorly been validated so far. The aim of our study was to investigate the analytical performance of free serum cortisol measurement employing equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration. Methods Two commercially available ultrafiltration devices and self-assembled dialysis cells, respectively, were studied. Cortisol was quantified in filtrate or dialysate using an automated immunoassay system. Using two serum pools, the inter-assay coefficient of variation was determined for the three methods and a method comparison was performed. Results Inter-assay coefficients of variation (n=10) between 3.2% and 14.8% were observed in the imprecision study. Method comparison demonstrated close agreement between free serum cortisol results obtained by ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis, respectively (equilibrium dialysis=1.2xultrafiltration+3.9 nmol/L; r=0.99; n=35). Conclusions Direct quantification of free serum cortisol after equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration of the samples offers acceptable reproducibility and results in close agreement can be obtained. Both methods can potentially be introduced into a routine laboratory setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm.2007.104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 45

Authors
Vogeser, M., Möhnle, P., & Briegel, J.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
521-5
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W2062518054
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
free cortisol, serum cortisol, equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration, automated immunoassay, adrenocortical function, method comparison, analytical performance
MeSH terms
Automation, Dialysis, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immunoassay, Ultrafiltration, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review