Cited by 24Bluetooth and Wireless Communication TechnologiesWireless Body Area NetworksNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies

Synchronization in wireless biomedical-sensor networks with bluetooth low energy

Open access
Bideaux, André, Zimmermann, Bernd, Hey, Stefan, Stork, Wilhelm·2015·Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has reduced the energy consumption for sensor nodes drastically. One major reason for this improvement is a non-continuous connection between the nodes. But this causes also a nondeterministic data transmission time. Most synchronization protocols are influenced by this characteristic, with the result of less accuracy. In wireless body sensor networks this accuracy is often of vital importance. Therefore this paper evaluates different synchronization principles customized for BLE. For the evaluation measurements we used two BLE modules connected to one micro controller. This setup allowed us to calculate the error directly for the different principles. First we measured the send-receive time as a reference which influences most synchronization protocols. This time is directly affected by random transmission delays of BLE. Second we used the time difference between receiving and acknowledging a message as principle (A). The last principle (B) can only be used between nodes that use BLE that don’t require a constant connection, because it needs to connect and disconnect the nodes. After a new connection the “connected” events occur in the BLE nodes almost at the same time and can be used for synchronization. The reference measurement showed the worst results. The average delay was 4.76 ms with a standard deviation of 2.32 ms. Principle (A) showed average delays of 7.51 ms, which was almost exactly 1 connection interval in our setup. The standard deviation was 0.41 ms. Principle (B) showed the best results with an average time difference of 39.92 μs and a standard deviation of 14.19 μs The results showed that with the principles (A) and (B) the synchronization of nodes can be highly improved compared to the reference. In future we will test the principles with synchronization protocols in real sensor nodes also with respect to the processor load.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cdbme-2015-0019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. M. Nakamura, J. Nakamura, G. Lopez, M. Shuzo, and I. Ya- mada, "Collaborative processing of wearable and ambient sensor system for blood pressure monitoring.," Sensors (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 6760-70, Jan. 2011.
  2. B. Sundararaman, U. Buy, and A. D. Kshemkalyani, "Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: A survey," Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, pp. 281-323, 2005.
  3. B. Sig, "Bluetooth Specification Version 4.2," History, vol. 0, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bideaux, A., Zimmermann, B., Hey, S., & Stork, W.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Bideaux, André
Venue
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
73-76
ISSN
2364-5504 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346898563
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
Keywords
Bluetooth Low Energy, wireless body sensor networks, synchronization protocols, clock synchronization, random transmission delays, energy consumption, sensor nodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review